https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 Differences in soil organic carbon and soil erosion for native pasture and minimum till agricultural management systems https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:47852 Wed 28 Feb 2024 14:55:59 AEDT ]]> Limitations to the soil impacts of tree regrowth in improved cattle pasture https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:52630 Thu 19 Oct 2023 15:13:48 AEDT ]]> Determining the depth and rate of soil movement down the soil profile using an environmental tracer: a hillslope scale assessment https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:55695 Mon 17 Jun 2024 15:05:57 AEST ]]> Soil erosion − The impact of grazing and regrowth trees https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:40599 Mon 08 Aug 2022 15:32:18 AEST ]]> Hillslope erosion in a grassland environment: calibration and evaluation of the SIBERIA landscape evolution model https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:39223 −1year⁻¹and 4.4 t ha⁻¹year⁻¹, respectively. These were found to closely match erosion rates estimated using the environmental tracer137Cs (2.7–4.8 t ha⁻¹year⁻¹. However, erosion and deposition estimated at individual points along the hillslopewas not well correlated with¹³⁷Cs at the same position due to the temporal averag-ing of the model and microtopography. Sensitivity analysis showed the model wasmore sensitive to parameterisation than sub-DEM-scale topography. This placesconfidence in the model’s ability to estimate erosion and deposition across an entirehillslope and catchment on decadal time scales. We also highlight the robustnessand flexibility of the calibration methods.]]> Fri 27 May 2022 11:51:25 AEST ]]>